I'll explain mine is greater detail: Legalizing drugs will make nations more in debt. You are saying that the government is going to make millions or even billions if we legalize drugs.
Politics and law The Social Order There is a progression in the minds of men: This is just what is happening with the idea of legalizing drugs: If intoxication in one form or another is inevitable, then so is customary or legal restraint upon that intoxication.
But no society until our own has had to contend with the ready availability of so many different mind-altering drugs, combined with a citizenry jealous of its right to pursue its own pleasures in its own way.
The arguments in favor of legalizing the use of all narcotic and stimulant drugs are twofold: Neither argument is negligible, but both are mistaken, I believe, and both miss the point.
The philosophic argument is that, in a free society, adults should be permitted to do whatever they please, always provided that they are prepared to take the consequences of their own choices and that they cause no direct harm to others.
Addiction to, or regular use of, most currently prohibited drugs cannot affect only the person who takes them—and not his spouse, children, neighbors, or employers. Such a principle is virtually useless in determining what should or should not be permitted.
But that is precisely the point. Human affairs cannot be decided by an appeal to an infallible rule, expressible in a few words, whose simple application can decide all cases, including whether drugs should be freely available to the entire adult population.
Philosophical fundamentalism is not preferable to the religious variety; and because the desiderata of human life are many, and often in conflict with one another, mere philosophical inconsistency in policy—such as permitting the consumption of alcohol while outlawing cocaine—is not a sufficient argument against that policy.
We all value freedom, and we all value order; sometimes we sacrifice freedom for order, and sometimes order for freedom. But once a prohibition has been removed, it is hard to restore, even when the newfound freedom proves to have been ill-conceived and socially disastrous.
Even Mill came to see the limitations of his own principle as a guide for policy and to deny that all pleasures were of equal significance for human existence.
It was better, he said, to be Socrates discontented than a fool satisfied. Mill acknowledged that some goals were intrinsically worthier of pursuit than others.
This being the case, not all freedoms are equal, and neither are all limitations of freedom: The freedom we cherish—or should cherish—is not merely that of satisfying our appetites, whatever they happen to be.
And we even recognize the apparent paradox that some limitations to our freedoms have the consequence of making us freer overall. The freest man is not the one who slavishly follows his appetites and desires throughout his life—as all too many of my patients have discovered to their cost.
We are prepared to accept limitations to our freedoms for many reasons, not just that of public order.Last March, Central American nations held a drug legalization summit in Antigua, Guatemala. As the host of the summit, Guatemalan President Otto Pérez Molina suggested that production, consumption, and sales of narcotics should be regulated and legalized.
1 In April, current strategies to fight the war on drugs received frequent criticism at the Summit of the Americas. Smart legalization would allow the use and sales of certain drugs, while minimizing the commercialization of legal drugs — by, for example, putting the state government in charge of drug .
It begins with drug producing countries (in this case, Colombia, Bolivia, and Peru), and then travels through the Northern Triangle (Guatemala, Honduras, and El Salvador), until it is trafficked through Mexico and into the U.S.
for consumption. Legalization appeals to . Legalization would have its benefits. less than 1 percent of America’s population — consume 80 percent of illegal hard drugs. them to favor prohibition and enforcement over. More than half of Americans now support legalizing marijuana, up 20 percentage points in the last decade.
But the concept of legalizing drugs is not as radical and modern as it may seem. For thousands of years, most drugs, including marijuana, morphine, .
Marijuana legalization, war on drugs emerge as issues in race between Beto O'Rourke and Ted Cruz. U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz has opened a new front in his crusade to paint his Democratic challenger, Beto.