Essay on Animal Testing: Coolessay in Other Taking into account broad discussions around the issue of animal testing, once you get an assignment to write an essay on this topic you should pick a side which you support.
Get Full Essay Get access to this section to get all help you need with your essay and educational issues. Get Access Argument Essay — Animal Testing is necessary Essay Sample Is it really necessary to take the lives of animals in the name of science and for the betterment of humanity?
PETA pressures labs into halting experiments, because they believe that animals are not to be used by humans for food, clothing, entertainment, or to experiment on People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals.
Its stance is that any testing is painful, inhumane, and unnecessary when alternatives are available. The PETA website says that animals, like humans, have interests that cannot be sacrificed or traded away simply because it might benefit others.
Essentially, PETA is of the opinion that animals and humans should have identical rights. In their press releases PETA puts out pictures of rabbits with open flesh wounds and dogs with rashes on their skins — all in an attempt to disgust people into sympathy for their cause.
In actuality the number of lab animals used has been cut in half in the last 25 years James-Enger. Of the animals used, 90 percent are rats and mice James-Enger. Moreover, 11 million animals die each year in animal shelters Americans for Medical Progress and an astounding 95 percent of the animals that die in America do so from human consumption James-Enger.
The reason that animal testing is appropriate is that there are regulations in place to minimize testing and pain, the alternatives are insufficient for now, and most importantly the information obtained from experimentation is irreplaceable. While animal rights groups such as PETA advocate abolishing all animal testing that inflicts pain on animals, proponents of testing cite laws and regulations which minimize pain and discomfort.
However, there are laws in place to minimize discomfort and inhumane treatment. The laws limit the amount of distress and pain an animal is subjected to. Tests can no longer be performed if conclusive data is already available.
Back in it was discovered that Procter and Gamble had performed experiments on guinea pigs when the data the tests was to obtain was already available Animal Testing by the Cosmetic Industry.
This is just one of the situations that newer animal testing legislation would have prevented or at least deterred. A fifty-point criterion for assessing pain is in place United States Department of Agriculture.
These points include everything from vocalization of pain to apparent depression. If there is no clear criteria then it is assumed that procedures that cause pain in humans also cause pain in animals United States Department of Agriculture. When an animal must be restrained it is to be limited to brief periods of around three minutes United States Department of Agriculture.
This is similar to the procedure followed when a doctor holds a child to administer a vaccination shot. For all surgeries and painful tests, sedatives and anesthetics must be utilized United States Department of Agriculture.
If the test will leave the animal permanently damaged, euthanasia must be administered before the anesthetic wears off United States Department of Agriculture. These few but important changes in animal research legislation have aided in improving animal welfare. PETA believes that the benefits of animal research do not outweigh the costs when alternatives are available; proponents argue that those alternatives are not effective.Argument Essay - Animal Testing is necessary.
Is it really necessary to take the lives of animals in the name of science and for the betterment of humanity? For animal rights activists, like People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), the answer is no. PETA pressures labs into halting experiments, because they believe that animals are /5(2).
Animal testing has been around for over years, since the early 17th century, though testing for cosmetic purposes did not start until the s.
Animal testing has been highly debated for many years for whether it is moral, ethical, humane, right, wrong, just, fair, etcetera. An argumentative essay is a type of essay which involves a set of completely developed arguments to support a thesis statement that takes a solid stance on a specific issue.
Argumentative Essay Example on Doublethink. The most important guarantee we offer is that if you are dissatisfied with your completed order, and if you can show us.
In your animal testing argumentative essay, you can expound upon this popular myth. The fact of the matter is that in order to yield reliable results one need a lot of life forms. However, for computer models all you need is the ability to infuse the programme with the necessary data and perform a .
Arguments against testing The critics of animal testing base their argument on the grounds of morality, the necessity or the validity of this procedure, whether proper authority to perform such tests is granted, whether such tests are actually needed and whether such tests practically provide us with any useful information.
Mar 30, · Animal Testing Argumentative Essay animal testing - Words March Necessary Testing Without a doubt animals are important to humans and human treatment towards them has become a major issue in society in the last few decades.