Catharina svanborg says she does essay

Term Papers Tagged With: I could not say why I had laid out the vegetables as I did.

Catharina svanborg says she does essay

Over the last century, the technologies used have constantly improved and it has become a highly effective way to treat cancer. However, physicians must still walk a fine line between delivering enough radiation to kill tumors, while sparing surrounding healthy tissue.

Catharina svanborg says she does essay

This works well if the tumor lies in an easily detectable and immobile location, but less so if the area is moving, as in the case of lung cancer. At the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, scientists are tackling the problem of accurately attacking tumors using a new technology known as an MR-linac that combines magnetic resonance MR imaging with linear accelerators linacs.

This allows doctors to detect and visualize any anatomical changes in a patient during treatment. Unlike CT or other x-ray based imaging modalities, which provide additional ionizing radiation, MRI is harmless to healthy tissue.

The MR-linac method offers a potentially significant improvement over current image-guided cancer treatment technology.

Researchers use software called Geant4 to simulate radiation within the detectors. Originally developed by CERN to simulate high energy particle physics experiments, the MD Anderson team has adapted Geant4 to incorporate magnetic fields into their computer dosimetry model.

We had to perform tests to make sure that we had the accuracy that we needed. In Augustthey published magnetic field correction factors in Medical Physics for six of the most-used ionization chamber detectors gas-filled chambers that are used to ensure the dose delivered from a therapy unit is correct.

They are now working on verifying these results experimentally. Proton Therapy Planning X-ray radiation is the most frequently used form of high-energy treatment, but a new treatment is emerging that uses a beam of protons to deliver energy directly to the tumor with minimal damage to surrounding tissues and without the side effects of x-ray therapy.

Like x-ray radiation, proton therapy blasts tumors with beams of particles. But whereas traditional radiation uses photons, or focused light beams, proton therapy uses ions — hydrogen atoms that have lost an electron.

X-ray radiation, on the other hand, deposits energy and kills cells along the whole length of the beam. This can lead to unintended cell damage and even secondary cancer that can develop years later.

In comparison with current radiation procedures, proton therapy saves healthy tissue in front of and behind the tumor. Since the patient is irradiated from all directions and the intensity of beams can be well modulated, the method provides further reduction of adverse effects.

Proton therapy is particularly effective when irradiating tumors near sensitive organs — for instance near the neck, spine, brain or lungs — where stray beams can be particularly damaging.

Medical physicists and radiation oncologists from Mayo Clinic in Phoenix, Arizona in collaboration with MD Anderson researchers, recently published a series of papers describing improved planning and use of proton therapy.

Writing in Medical Physics in Januarythey showed that in the three clinical cases included in this study, their chance-constrained model was better at sparing organs at risk than the current method. The model also provided a flexible tool for users to balance between plan robustness and plan quality and was found to be much faster than the commercial solution.

The research used the Stampede supercomputer at TACC to conduct computationally intensive studies of the hundreds of factors that go into maximizing the effectiveness of, and minimizing the risk and uncertainties involved in, these treatments.

Proton therapy was first developed in the s and came into mainstream in the s. There are currently 12 proton therapy centers nation-wide and the number is growing. They are applied only in cases that require extra precision and doctors must maximize their benefit when they are used. Mayo Clinic and MD Anderson operate the most advanced versions of these devices, which perform scanning beam proton therapy and are able to modulate the intensity of the beam.

The specificity of the proton beam, which is its greatest advantage, means that it must be precisely calibrated and that discrepancies from the ideal must be considered.

For instance, hospital staff situate patients on the operating surface of the device, and even placing a patient a few millimeters off-center can impact the success of the treatment. The solution to these challenges is robust optimization, which uses mathematical techniques to generate a plan that can manage and mitigate the uncertainties and human errors that may arise.

You can choose different beam angles or energy or intensity. There are 25, variables or more, so generating a plan that is robust to these mistakes and can still get the proper dose distribution to the tumor is a large-scale optimization problem.

Leading commercial companies have adopted methods similar to those that Liu and his collaborators developed as the basis for their radiation planning solutions. In the May issue of the International Journal of Radiation Oncology, they showed that compared to its 3D counterpart, 4D robust optimization for lung cancer treatment provided more robust target dose distribution and better target coverage, while still offering normal tissue protection.

Uncovering the Quantum Basis of Proton Cancer Therapy Like many forms of cancer therapy, clinicians know that proton therapy works, but precisely how it works is a bit of a mystery. The basic principle is not in question: Because of their high rate of division and reduced ability to repair damaged DNA, cancerous cells are much more vulnerable to DNA attacks than normal cells and are killed at a higher rate.

Furthermore, a proton beam can be focused on a tumor area, thus causing maximum damage on cancerous cells and minimum damage on surrounding healthy cells. However, beyond this general microscopic picture, the mechanics of the process have been hard to determine.

Morales, a professor of chemistry at Texas Tech University and a leading proponent of the computational analysis of proton therapy. Computational experiments can mimic the dynamics of the proton-cell interactions without causing damage to a patient and can reveal what happens when the proton beam and cells collide from start to finish, with atomic-level accuracy.Magic, Ritual, and Witchcraft Summer vice versa.5 Thus, historians of witchcraft simply need Ankarloo’s and Clark’s Witchcraft and Magic in Europe.

The series brings together eighteen articles by distinguished scholars in six volumes. Its concept entails a most daring approach to magic. Katherine.

Widely reputed throughout Padua to be a shrew, Katherine is foul-tempered and sharp-tongued at the start of the play. She constantly insults and degrades the men around her, and she is prone to wild displays of anger, during which she may physically attack whomever enrages her.

Essay · Manhood. 1. Men adrift. 2. Section 2. 3. “Sometimes they help out but basically I do it all,” she says. She gave up trying to make either man do his share. says Karin Svanborg. Why Does Sartre Say That Our Emotions Are Transformations of the World words | 4 pages In this essay, I will attempt to explain why Sartre argues that emotions are transformations of the world in his book, “A sketch for the Theory of the Emotions”.

She found it difficult to meet men, especially as she avoided pubs and nightclubs, and worked such long hours at a coffee shop in the city’s financial district that she met only stockbrokers.

Things take a turn for the worse when she's teamed up with enigmatic Detective Julien Chateau, and can’t get him out of her mind or dreams! Now, not only does she have to battle mobster Gabrianni's growing army of vampires, but she has to guard her sensitive heart when she feels powerfully drawn to /5(15).

Could breastmilk prevent cancer? | Yahoo Answers